4 Comments
User's avatar
Gerry's avatar

I have seen that and I think it’s an evolution heading in the right direction. More important for me is the new usage of computer simulations for goaltending calls. The graphics remove all doubt about the right call, and they are fast.

The coach’s challenges seem to be more quickly resolved with the “valet” headsets

John Steppling's avatar

i dont want MORE tech in the game. Also its an absolute illusion that graphics remove all doubt. People tend to be delusional about AI in general. It still has to be programmed (Ive written on this field). There is a large amount of anticipation unconsciously factored into programming. If its not broke, dont fix it. Is it broke? Really? Id much rather have gambling banned and a focus put on cleaning up that.

Terry K. Cargill's avatar

Seems like it should be an improvement. The timing of it is pretty amazing--take a bow!

Hopefully we will be able to see the results, particularly in the length of time it takes to do a coach's review.

On another aspect of referring, it seems to me that the block/charge calls really favor the offense for the most part, and a whole lot of offensive push-off fouls are not called. I know these issues has been subject to re-interpretation in the past. Any chance they will be re-visited in the near future.

Terry K. Cargill's avatar

Watching Mavs-Warriors and they are wired!